So, why are the libertarians on “the website that shall not be named” arguing in favor of the tech companies colluding to deplatform Alex Jones? I do believe there is a difference between a baker or other small business refusing service to a customer and a social media platform who advertises to be a public forum. These companies didn’t make the content, all they do is allow the content a platform to present it.
Anyway, I am confused as I thought libertarians would see the difference. Also one who says they are for Freedom of Speech, might actually be a WEE bit concerned to see these social media platforms collude to wipe clean any trace of ideas they believe to be “offensive” meanwhile allowing other content which is arguably worse content to remain. Just saying.