Oh Ruby…..

I’m getting this overpowering déjà vu  ever since Epstein’s  death was reported.

In 1963 I was a kid, still very much a totally self-centered innocent, barely aware of any events at all from the big grownup world—when it suddenly intruded on my consciousness with a BANG💥.  Of gunfire.  In fact, two such bursts in quick succession: JFK’s assassination, followed very shortly by Jack Ruby’s assassination of Lee Harvey  Oswald :  surely at that time “the most hated man in America.”

Did Oswald “act alone”?   And how could the one  man in America whom everybody wanted to shoot, actually have been shot  while in custody!?!   By that seemingly hapless chubby nondescript Jack Ruby!? Now we would never know!!   But we would damn well bloviate about it endlessly, for decades.

If Oswald did have co-conspirators, or if he was the puppet of some international cabal, he and his masters had gone to great  lengths to hide that.  So either he was just an isolated nutcase, or, he wasn’t, but the entire operation was so sophisticated that the only possibility of finding The Truth woulda been to interrogate him.    And Jack Ruby, conveniently or tragically, depending on your point of view (and everybody had one!)   had now balked us of ever knowing.

Re:  Epstein, I’m now reading everywhere that in killing himself ( and I’m probably alone in thinking that’s perfectly plausible, or if he didn’t, I’m sure he welcomed his executioner.  I read that suicide is the most common cause of death in our prisons, except on Death Row, where it’s “natural causes”…)   he selfishly(!) and craftily put an end to the criminal case!  The incriminating info he knew died with him!

Yuh, cep’n….he himself wouldnta had to talk anyway, remember?  Right Of  the accused to remain silent, and all?   Plus, the guy had his own island, with many luxurious buildings, and I assume  he employed plenty of people to see  to it that his illustrious guests were fed, served, had their linens changed ( oh god, especially that…) ..plus, you hadda fly there, right?   And planes keep logs.  My point is, there must be a veritable host, so great a cloud of witnesses, who,participated in, and/or knew all about, his alleged crimes.    Not to mention his “victims”, from whom I’m afraid we now have to anticipate a slew of tell-all books (conveniently glossing over how they happened to find themselves in a position to be solicited in the first place).

No, Epstein isn’t really Oswald and Ruby rolled into one.

But waking up this Sunday morning,  it sure feels like America is buying into that.  Déja vu:  it’s 1963 all over again.

3+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar

16 thoughts on “Oh Ruby…..”

  1. Hypatia:
    But waking up this Sunday morning,  it sure feels like America is buying into that.

    You want a conspiracy theory?  I’ve got a conspiracy theory, but probably not the one you expected.

    What happened yesterday was like firing a shotgun in an aviary.  The first reaction is silence.  Then there’s a chirp, then a few more chirps, and before long everything is back to normal.  What we’ve seen so far is everybody whose mind was already made up how to interpret something like this sounding off.  What hasn’t yet happened is the construction of the narrative and its distribution to those who will parrot it throughout the ruling class (in which I include the legacy media).  I am absolutely persuaded (i.e., this is not a provocative talking point, but something of which I have become convinced through observation over more than two decades) that there is a shop somewhere that prepares the talking points for the slavers and distributes them through a hierarchical network to those who repeat them to the public.  For example, how many times had you heard the phrases “white nationalism” or “white supremacy” over the last five years?  Lo and behold, suddenly, without any obvious precipitating event, we’re hearing them everywhere, from Democrat “debates” to talking heads on television, to pundits in every medium.  That is a textbook example of the construction and co-ordinated roll-out of a narrative.  Just think back over the last ten years and you’ll find dozens more.

    I therefore make the following prediction.  Some time within the next 36 hours, perhaps as soon as the Sunday talk shows in the U.S., a pre-packaged narrative about the Epstein demise will be rolled out, and you will hear the same words from the lips of all of the slavers bent on covering the tracks of their colleagues implicated in Epstein’s web of sin.  But don’t be taken in.

    11+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  2. Okay, this is crazy, but it just…might…work!  Epstein was killed by (wait for it, this is gold!) The Russians!  to protect their operative Donald Trump, who after all, was once photographed decades ago within ten feet of Epstein!  Yeah that’s the ticket!  Epstein, Trump and The Russians were in league for decades to entrap innocent Democrats like Bill Clinton! and look how well it worked!   Why, those wealthy Dems were every bit as much Epstein’s/Trump’s/ The Russians’ “victims” as those precocious li’l child prostitutes!

    Oh, how perfect: just when it looked like The Russians had been dethroned  as arch-villains, exiled from the news by Mueller’s pathetic performance. “Now thanked be god who has matched us with His hour”, willsoon be on the lips of every Prog…..nah?  Too kooky?  All I can say is

    I hope so.

    ( because now, of course, we’ll never know.) 

    3+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  3. And just to seal the certainty of a storm of  obloquy hailing on my head:

    in my view, Epstein had NO “victims”.  He had accomplices.

    And yes,  that includes the “child” prostitutes or their parents/guardians  if they were minors.

    I’m sure he and his guests didn’t  want the scrawny, drug-addicted, disease ridden ,snaggle or no-toothed young homeless population, the kids nobody cares about, in their satin-sheeted beds.  This operation was exposed decades ago.  His original “victims” must be middle-aged by now.  What do people think, that if they, or their  kid, was  approached by Epstein, that he was gonna fly them to an all-expense-paid  tropical Bible camp?

    IMHO:  Nuh-uh.  They were given the job  description, well paid for their services, well paid for their silence, and now they’ll be well-paid for breaking that silence.

    5+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  4. Hypatia:
    And just to seal the certainty of a storm of  obloquy hailing on my head:

    in my view, Epstein had NO “victims”.  He had accomplices.

    And yes,  that includes the “child” prostitutes or their parents/guardians  if they were minors.

    I’m sure he and his guests didn’t  want the scrawny, drug-addicted, disease ridden ,snaggle or no-toothed young homeless population, the kids nobody cares about, in their satin-sheeted beds.  This operation was exposed decades ago.  His original “victims” must be middle-aged by now.  What do people think, that if they, or their  kid, was  approached by Epstein, that he was gonna fly them to an all-expense-paid  tropical Bible camp?

    IMHO:  Nuh-uh.  They were given the job  description, well paid for their services, well paid for their silence, and now they’ll be well-paid for breaking that silence.

    How do you define victim? Are there no times where a person of equal power abuses that power?

    If an animal takes the bait freely and then gets trapped would it not be preyed upon?

    1+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
  5. 10 Cents:

    Hypatia:
    And just to seal the certainty of a storm of  obloquy hailing on my head:

    in my view, Epstein had NO “victims”.  He had accomplices.

    And yes,  that includes the “child” prostitutes or their parents/guardians  if they were minors.

    I’m sure he and his guests didn’t  want the scrawny, drug-addicted, disease ridden ,snaggle or no-toothed young homeless population, the kids nobody cares about, in their satin-sheeted beds.  This operation was exposed decades ago.  His original “victims” must be middle-aged by now.  What do people think, that if they, or their  kid, was  approached by Epstein, that he was gonna fly them to an all-expense-paid  tropical Bible camp?

    IMHO:  Nuh-uh.  They were given the job  description, well paid for their services, well paid for their silence, and now they’ll be well-paid for breaking that silence.

    How do you define victim? Are there no times where a person of equal power abuses that power?

    If an animal takes the bait freely and then gets trapped would it not be preyed upon?

    Humans ain’t animals.  We know bait when we see it; they don’t.

    0

  6. 10 Cents:

    Hypatia:
    And just to seal the certainty of a storm of  obloquy hailing on my head:

    in my view, Epstein had NO “victims”.  He had accomplices.

    And yes,  that includes the “child” prostitutes or their parents/guardians  if they were minors.

    I’m sure he and his guests didn’t  want the scrawny, drug-addicted, disease ridden ,snaggle or no-toothed young homeless population, the kids nobody cares about, in their satin-sheeted beds.  This operation was exposed decades ago.  His original “victims” must be middle-aged by now.  What do people think, that if they, or their  kid, was  approached by Epstein, that he was gonna fly them to an all-expense-paid  tropical Bible camp?

    IMHO:  Nuh-uh.  They were given the job  description, well paid for their services, well paid for their silence, and now they’ll be well-paid for breaking that silence.

    How do you define victim? Are there no times where a person of equal power abuses that power?

    If an animal takes the bait freely and then gets trapped would it not be preyed upon?

    There’s room for debate here. A 14-year old can be an accomplice and a victim at the same time.

    3+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
    • avatar
    • avatar
  7. Hypatia:
    If I may….does anybody else have thoughts about comparing Oswald’s untimely death to Epstein’s?

    The defense never allows me to sit on a jury.

    1+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
  8. Hypatia:

    10 Cents:

    Hypatia:
    And just to seal the certainty of a storm of  obloquy hailing on my head:

    in my view, Epstein had NO “victims”.  He had accomplices.

    And yes,  that includes the “child” prostitutes or their parents/guardians  if they were minors.

    I’m sure he and his guests didn’t  want the scrawny, drug-addicted, disease ridden ,snaggle or no-toothed young homeless population, the kids nobody cares about, in their satin-sheeted beds.  This operation was exposed decades ago.  His original “victims” must be middle-aged by now.  What do people think, that if they, or their  kid, was  approached by Epstein, that he was gonna fly them to an all-expense-paid  tropical Bible camp?

    IMHO:  Nuh-uh.  They were given the job  description, well paid for their services, well paid for their silence, and now they’ll be well-paid for breaking that silence.

    How do you define victim? Are there no times where a person of equal power abuses that power?

    If an animal takes the bait freely and then gets trapped would it not be preyed upon?

    Humans ain’t animals.  We know bait when we see it; they don’t.

    You have a high view of human nature. I take it you were not in sales.

    1+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
  9. Hypatia:

    10 Cents:

    Hypatia:
    And just to seal the certainty of a storm of  obloquy hailing on my head:

    in my view, Epstein had NO “victims”.  He had accomplices.

    And yes,  that includes the “child” prostitutes or their parents/guardians  if they were minors.

    I’m sure he and his guests didn’t  want the scrawny, drug-addicted, disease ridden ,snaggle or no-toothed young homeless population, the kids nobody cares about, in their satin-sheeted beds.  This operation was exposed decades ago.  His original “victims” must be middle-aged by now.  What do people think, that if they, or their  kid, was  approached by Epstein, that he was gonna fly them to an all-expense-paid  tropical Bible camp?

    IMHO:  Nuh-uh.  They were given the job  description, well paid for their services, well paid for their silence, and now they’ll be well-paid for breaking that silence.

    How do you define victim? Are there no times where a person of equal power abuses that power?

    If an animal takes the bait freely and then gets trapped would it not be preyed upon?

    Humans ain’t animals.  We know bait when we see it; they don’t.

    I take it that the ‘me too’ movement gets nowhere with you?

    1+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
  10. Hypatia:
    If I may….does anybody else have thoughts about comparing Oswald’s untimely death to Epstein’s?

    Yes. I think they are comparable. As one who is certain that a small cabal within the NAT SEC world killed JFK over many reasons, I will tell you that Oswald had to be silenced because he was going to give up the whole thing if he went to trial. Oswald was a ground level intelligence operator, so he knew the trigger men. From there you get the logistics people, I.e, paymasters and pilots/drivers. From there you get the organizers. From there you get the planners.

    A similar trail of witness evidence could have been established through Epstein. And for that they both had to go. I will never believe that Epstein ever committed suicide.

    2+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
    • avatar
  11. I think he very well may have. And I think, as I said in my post, that IF there were the will to do so, there are many people who can expose the operation.

    but I don’t think the will exists.

    1+

    Users who have liked this comment:

    • avatar
  12. RE: JFK assassination. Did you ever encounter the story that the fatal shot was an accidental firing of an AR-15 by a member of the secret service?

    0

  13. Robert A. McReynolds:

    Hypatia:
    If I may….does anybody else have thoughts about comparing Oswald’s untimely death to Epstein’s?

    Yes. I think they are comparable. As one who is certain that a small cabal within the NAT SEC world killed JFK over many reasons, I will tell you that Oswald had to be silenced because he was going to give up the whole thing if he went to trial. Oswald was a ground level intelligence operator, so he knew the trigger men. From there you get the logistics people, I.e, paymasters and pilots/drivers. From there you get the organizers. From there you get the planners.

    A similar trail of witness evidence could have been established through Epstein. And for that they both had to go. I will never believe that Epstein ever committed suicide.

    If Oswald was that sophisticated, why do you think he’da given anything up?  He was certainly going to get the death penalty; I don’t think the country woulda stomached a plea deal where he lived on.

    with Epstein, maybe he would have implicated his wealthy friends in exchange for a reduced sentence. But maybe not; they might have provided “humanitarian” assistance to him or his family if he just remained silent.

    0

Leave a Reply