24 thoughts on “More LBTQWTF Bad News…”

  1. By the way, in 7th grade, what in the hell are you coming out as? How old are you in 7th Grade? 12, 13? I mean at that point the hormonal juices are just starting to flow. How on Earth do you know–DING!!–at that moment, “hmm I like my own kind.” This is just surreal. Really it is.

    4+
    avataravataravataravatar
  2. “I never knew about it,” said Loesch, 15, a sophomore at Haddon Heights High who came out in seventh grade and now identifies as gender-queer.

    I’m just tired of being confused. I’ve always prided myself on being au currant because I had to be for business reasons alone! But…

    Would somebody pls explain what in the hell is “gender-queer?”

    3+
    avataravataravatar
  3. EThompson:
    “I never knew about it,” said Loesch, 15, a sophomore at Haddon Heights High who came out in seventh grade and now identifies as gender-queer.

    I’m just tired of being confused. I’ve always prided myself on being au currant because I had to be for business reasons alone! But…

    Would somebody pls explain what in the hell is “gender-queer?”

    I think it means, “I’m a privileged white kid, so I have no oppression points. To get said oppression points I will identity as gender queer or non binary, because I’m not really gay or trans but I want to be part of an oppressed group. Also to be gender queer I really just have to wear baggy clothes, have short hair and get a few piercings and I’m good”

    being gender queer is like being goth, it’s fashion.

    3+
    avataravataravatar
  4. This is a little odd, but I am in complete agreement with Karl Marx in his opposition to public education. Karl Marx didn’t want the government to provide public education because he knew that it would be a tool of indoctrination. We should abandon public school and bring back child labor.

    1+
    avatar
  5. Thomas Sowell remarked, as I recall in Inside American Education, that it isn’t just how much nonsense and indoctrination children were being taught, but also that this stuff was squeezing out actual knowledge and skills which are useful in life after graduation, and used to be taught much more effectively even when many attended school for less than 12 years.

    Note the sentence in the linked article, “Teachers later will be able to modify the suggested curriculum and make their existing lesson plans for subjects such as science, math, and music more inclusive.”  I don’t recall almost anything in my elementary and high school science and math classes about the personal lives of mathematicians and scientists and certainly not with whom and how they employed their private parts.  There may have been a little more in the one music course I had in high school, but that was mostly about eccentricities of composers intended to hold the attention of deeply bored students.  The whole point of these classes about the great intellectual achievements of humanity is what was created and discovered, not who did it or what they did to amuse themselves while not working.

    7+
    avataravataravataravataravataravataravatar
  6. Also, this curriculum almost has to focus on more modern figures who are open about what they do in the bedroom. Most historical figures, whether or not they were LGBT would be based on speculation.

    This is the problem with school curriculum as well, is that they are WAY to focused on the modern era. Most of these teachers have no concept of the long view of history. Do they even do survey courses anymore?

    I mean didn’t they mention Pete Buttigieg as a figure they are highlighting in school? That is ridiculous. Who cares about Mayor Pete. Just end public school, I’m sick of paying for it and the kids don’t learn anything useful. Let’s just tear it down.

    4+
    avataravataravataravatar
  7. Mate De:
    Also, this curriculum almost has to focus on more modern figures who are open about what they do in the bedroom. Most historical figures, whether or not they were LGBT would be based on speculation.

    This has already happened in California’s curriculum. They have gone to great lengths to paint Lincoln and Benjamin Harrison as homosexuals although there is zero concrete evidence and only circumstantial evidence pulled from letters. They are analyzing language of the mid-19th Century with the 21st Century agendas. People talked vastly different back then than they do now, yet it is enough for them to declare, “nope, they are homos!”

    6+
    avataravataravataravataravataravatar
  8. Robert A. McReynolds:

    Mate De:
    Also, this curriculum almost has to focus on more modern figures who are open about what they do in the bedroom. Most historical figures, whether or not they were LGBT would be based on speculation.

    This has already happened in California’s curriculum. They have gone to great lengths to paint Lincoln and Benjamin Harrison as homosexuals although there is zero concrete evidence and only circumstantial evidence pulled from letters. They are analyzing language of the mid-19th Century with the 21st Century agendas. People talked vastly different back then than they do now, yet it is enough for them to declare, “nope, they are homos!”

    Yes I know what you mean. The horrible tragedy of them doing that, is that it sexualizes the bond that two men can have in love and friendship. Will they interpret the Gospel of John when Christ asked Peter if he loved him and Peter said that he did. Will they say now that is a romantic love? It’s so disgusting, and now young men will think that if they love their male friend that means they’re gay.

    3+
    avataravataravatar
  9. Mate De:

    Robert A. McReynolds:

    Mate De:
    Also, this curriculum almost has to focus on more modern figures who are open about what they do in the bedroom. Most historical figures, whether or not they were LGBT would be based on speculation.

    This has already happened in California’s curriculum. They have gone to great lengths to paint Lincoln and Benjamin Harrison as homosexuals although there is zero concrete evidence and only circumstantial evidence pulled from letters. They are analyzing language of the mid-19th Century with the 21st Century agendas. People talked vastly different back then than they do now, yet it is enough for them to declare, “nope, they are homos!”

    Yes I know what you mean. The horrible tragedy of them doing that, is that it sexualizes the bond that two men can have in love and friendship. Will they interpret the Gospel of John when Christ asked Peter if he loved him and Peter said that he did. Will they say now that is a romantic love? It’s so disgusting, and now young men will think that if they love their male friend that means they’re gay.

    Greek has different words for love so that won’t happen unless someone is clueless.

    3+
    avataravataravatar
  10. Henry Castaigne:
    This is a little odd, but I am in complete agreement with Karl Marx in his opposition to public education. Karl Marx didn’t want the government to provide public education because he knew that it would be a tool of indoctrination. We should abandon public school and bring back child labor.

    Ironic indeed!

    2+
    avataravatar
  11. Mate De:

    Robert A. McReynolds:

    Mate De:
    Also, this curriculum almost has to focus on more modern figures who are open about what they do in the bedroom. Most historical figures, whether or not they were LGBT would be based on speculation.

    This has already happened in California’s curriculum. They have gone to great lengths to paint Lincoln and Benjamin Harrison as homosexuals although there is zero concrete evidence and only circumstantial evidence pulled from letters. They are analyzing language of the mid-19th Century with the 21st Century agendas. People talked vastly different back then than they do now, yet it is enough for them to declare, “nope, they are homos!”

    Yes I know what you mean. The horrible tragedy of them doing that, is that it sexualizes the bond that two men can have in love and friendship. Will they interpret the Gospel of John when Christ asked Peter if he loved him and Peter said that he did. Will they say now that is a romantic love? It’s so disgusting, and now young men will think that if they love their male friend that means they’re gay.

    Isn’t that what Netflix has done with this most recent Jesus show they produced? I haven’t seen a second of it and won’t, but they made Jesus homosexual and I presume this very part of the Gospel is what they are bouncing off of.

    2+
    avataravatar
  12. 10 Cents:

    Mate De:

    Robert A. McReynolds:

    Mate De:
    Also, this curriculum almost has to focus on more modern figures who are open about what they do in the bedroom. Most historical figures, whether or not they were LGBT would be based on speculation.

    This has already happened in California’s curriculum. They have gone to great lengths to paint Lincoln and Benjamin Harrison as homosexuals although there is zero concrete evidence and only circumstantial evidence pulled from letters. They are analyzing language of the mid-19th Century with the 21st Century agendas. People talked vastly different back then than they do now, yet it is enough for them to declare, “nope, they are homos!”

    Yes I know what you mean. The horrible tragedy of them doing that, is that it sexualizes the bond that two men can have in love and friendship. Will they interpret the Gospel of John when Christ asked Peter if he loved him and Peter said that he did. Will they say now that is a romantic love? It’s so disgusting, and now young men will think that if they love their male friend that means they’re gay.

    Greek has different words for love so that won’t happen unless someone is clueless.

    Dime, we are talking about the woke Left. Clueless doesn’t begin to describe it.

    2+
    avataravatar
  13. Robert A. McReynolds:

    10 Cents:

    Mate De:

    Robert A. McReynolds:

    Mate De:
    Also, this curriculum almost has to focus on more modern figures who are open about what they do in the bedroom. Most historical figures, whether or not they were LGBT would be based on speculation.

    This has already happened in California’s curriculum. They have gone to great lengths to paint Lincoln and Benjamin Harrison as homosexuals although there is zero concrete evidence and only circumstantial evidence pulled from letters. They are analyzing language of the mid-19th Century with the 21st Century agendas. People talked vastly different back then than they do now, yet it is enough for them to declare, “nope, they are homos!”

    Yes I know what you mean. The horrible tragedy of them doing that, is that it sexualizes the bond that two men can have in love and friendship. Will they interpret the Gospel of John when Christ asked Peter if he loved him and Peter said that he did. Will they say now that is a romantic love? It’s so disgusting, and now young men will think that if they love their male friend that means they’re gay.

    Greek has different words for love so that won’t happen unless someone is clueless.

    Dime, we are talking about the woke Left. Clueless doesn’t begin to describe it.

    They sound more asleep than woke.

    1+
    avatar
  14. John Walker:
    Note the sentence in the linked article, “Teachers later will be able to modify the suggested curriculum and make their existing lesson plans for subjects such as science, math, and music more inclusive.”  I don’t recall almost anything in my elementary and high school science and math classes about the personal lives of mathematicians and scientists and certainly not with whom and how they employed their private parts.

    “Class, Newton’s second law of motion can be stated as F=ma”

    “Excuse me teacher. Did Newton have anal sex with men?”

    “I don’t believe so but . . .”

    “Oral?”

    “Not that I’m aware of.”

    “Then why do we have to learn this?”

    5+
    avataravataravataravataravatar
  15. Mate De:
    Also, this curriculum almost has to focus on more modern figures who are open about what they do in the bedroom. Most historical figures, whether or not they were LGBT would be based on speculation.

    This is the problem with school curriculum as well, is that they are WAY to focused on the modern era. Most of these teachers have no concept of the long view of history. Do they even do survey courses anymore?

    I mean didn’t they mention Pete Buttigieg as a figure they are highlighting in school? That is ridiculous. Who cares about Mayor Pete. Just end public school, I’m sick of paying for it and the kids don’t learn anything useful. Let’s just tear it down.

    I’m with Betsy DeVoss; let’s use public funds to build charter schools and if you don’t have parents who can’t participate or get involved, then their kids don’t get in. I’m tired of students who want to learn having their classrooms disrupted by ne’er-do-wells. Throw the thugs out on the street where at least the police are better able to handle them than teachers who were not trained in the academy!

    I had a teacher friend who in her “salad days” thought she’d be the next Sidney Poitier but after six months she was accosted in a restroom. She’s now teaching in a private school and I don’t blame her.

    3+
    avataravataravatar

Leave a Reply