Tucker Carlson

Tucker Carlson: Big Tech censors COVID-19 video featuring doctors

QUOTE; “Social media giants pulled the video of doctors in lab coats talking about coronavirus research and they hid it from the public.”

IMHO; a darn good presentation, I encourage you to watch it. The video has been posted under a different heading, what I am hoping to illustrate is his observations on this and the reason(s) for the demon-crats and big business and internet giants blocking it thereby influencing the election.

A whole new version of dirty politics…

sad, very sad…

4+
avataravataravataravatar

8 thoughts on “Tucker Carlson”

  1. If HCQ turns out to ultimately be found beneficial, the Dems will flood the internet with assertions that Trump suppressed it and everything before that will be memory holed by the tech. giants.

    5+
    avataravataravataravataravatar
  2. ctlaw:
    If HCQ turns out to ultimately be found beneficial, the Dems will flood the internet with assertions that Trump suppressed it and everything before that will be memory holed by the tech. giants.

    The whole current round of censorship is predicated on a technicality.  A couple of the doctors (or other healthcare professionals; I wasn’t keeping score) had referred to hydroxychloroquine as a “cure.”

    The “fact-checkers” sprang into action, labeling the statement false false false pants on fire false.

    But hydroxychloroquine has been proven as an effective treatment, especially if administered early after virus onset and in combination with zinc and steroids.

    They are making a mountain out of a molehill, as Democrats are frequently wont to do.

    I agree with you.  When they are forced to drop their lies, the lies will be covered up and never spoken of.

    They will move from the current lies to new lies.

    4+
    avataravataravataravatar
  3. I think the Tech Giants have inadvertently promoted this video. The reason it was squelched because it was credible. Worse things than this has been done and no one has been banned or suspended.

    2+
    avataravatar
  4. MJBubba:
    The whole current round of censorship is predicated on a technicality.  A couple of the doctors (or other healthcare professionals; I wasn’t keeping score) had referred to hydroxychloroquine as a “cure.”

    The ‘cure’ challenge is hocus-pocus distraction excuse-making nonsensical wordplay.

    Cure   kyoo͝r 

    n.
    A drug or course of medical treatment used to restore health.

    • n.
      Restoration of health; recovery from disease.

    I think hydroxychloroquine qualifies as a cure given the above definition.  The media is purposely conflating the word ‘cure’ with ‘kill’ (as in ‘kill the virus’) knowing the public is likely to fall for the ruse.

    It is the same word games they are playing with the criminal rioting/destruction claiming the ‘protesters’ are in fact ‘predominantly’ peaceful simply because a video shows only 5 [of the] people, in a crowd of 300 people, were involved in beating some person or setting a fire.  Clearly, since 295 of the people did not set the fire, it is fair to say the group was predominantly peaceful.   Not true.   But saying so ensures the people remain ‘properly controlled in their thinking’ about what they are looking at:  a ‘peaceful protest/assembly’ when in fact they are looking at an active insurrection, rioting, criminal activity, etc.

    MSM knows they can switch the ‘topic’ mid-sentence ( e.g., violence/destruction vs. people count) and the MSNBC viewers will fall for it every time.  FOX does it all the time too.

    (Update:  so much edited, I should have just deleted the entire comment and began anew.)

    4+
    avataravataravataravatar
  5. By the same definition most armies could be defined as mostly peaceful since the people at the “tip of the spear” are small.

    CNN: The Ministry of Truth Network

    5+
    avataravataravataravataravatar
  6. Zuckerberg bragged that facedrek stops 90% of “hate speech” before anyone sees it. He never defines it, but he means any non-progressive opinions. Until he and his ilk have the fear of God put into them, they will never stop censoring. I suppose we on the right should be gratified that the lefties believe us to be so peaceable that we will never come after them, or indeed resist them in any way. There is nothing quite like the fear of grievous bodily harm to focus the mind. I find myself hoping that some more courageous than myself may soon take effective action to push back against this despicable censorship. If violence by mobs has the approval of democrat politicians, why shouldn’t violence against censorship be OK? Dems and the ACLU have been vehemently opposed to censorship since time immemorial, haven’t they?

    5+
    avataravataravataravataravatar
  7. CW, you’re hoping somebody else will become violent in our cause? #metoo! I would like to think I could be a soldier, but…🙀

    Still:

    why don’t we all just passively rebel?

    Refuse to do what we’re commanded? Open our businesses,  shed our masks, stage amateur entertainments, eVen hymn sings, where we can mingle in crowds again? THAT I would do!

    Because, um…who’s gonna stop us?  The police? 😂😂😂😂😂

     

    About the police, it occurs to me that the Left has every reason to encourage demonization and elimination of them, because they are an armed force under local control and with roots in the Particular political subdivisions they serve.  They could easily morph into a Local militia dedicated to preserving freedoms in a particular locality.  They have to be disbanded (and the more of them hurt And disabled the better!) so a national police State can be established. Remember how troublesome the Paris police were to the Nazi occupiers.

    4+
    avataravataravataravatar

Leave a Reply