John Roberts Facilitates Stolen Election

John Roberts joined the three remaining Commies on the Bench to allow for election ballots with NO post-mark to be counted three days after the election. I have been saying that the Dems will know how many “votes” they need over the course of three to ten days after the election, and here is Roberts backing me up with his gutless ruling.

Folks, you are going to be governed by the approved people even if it means complete destruction of whatever was left of our republic. Never again, will we be allowed to choose someone who does not come from the ranks of the political class. Open rigging of the election and yet we still sit on our hands. Whatever, I am going to be able to make some money as a lawyer in this stupid system we have allowed them to construct so let’s just get this over with.

John Roberts Sides with Liberal Justices – Allows Pennsylvania to Count Non-Postmarked Ballots Three Days After Election Day

7+
avataravataravataravataravataravataravatar

7 thoughts on “John Roberts Facilitates Stolen Election”

  1. There has long been speculation that the Clinton Machine has something incriminating on Roberts — or more likely on some member of Robert’s family.  That used to sound very tin-foil hat territory , but now that we have seen the open unpunished corruption in the FBI, CIA, FISA Court, etc — I just don’t know.

    6+
    avataravataravataravataravataravatar
  2. Gavin Longmuir:
    There has long been speculation that the Clinton Machine has something incriminating on Roberts — or more likely on some member of Robert’s family.  That used to sound very tin-foil hat territory , but now that we have seen the open unpunished corruption in the FBI, CIA, FISA Court, etc — I just don’t know.

    Or, or And

     

    He’s exactly like W invisioned. A Pox be upon them both.

    2+
    avataravatar
  3. Gavin Longmuir:
    There has long been speculation that the Clinton Machine has something incriminating on Roberts — or more likely on some member of Robert’s family.  That used to sound very tin-foil hat territory , but now that we have seen the open unpunished corruption in the FBI, CIA, FISA Court, etc — I just don’t know.

    Oh if we could only clarify this little tid-bit:

    Gates was not the only famous name to hop aboard Epstein’s plane either, with the serial pedophile also welcoming famed newsman Walter Cronkite, architect Peter Marino and a passenger identified as John Roberts.

    He [John Roberts] flew with Epstein on at least two occasions according to flight records, from March 22, 2010 and February 10, 2011.

    In 2010 the plane with Roberts traveled from Palm Beach to Oakland, and the following year from Palm Beach to Teterboro.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7350469/Bill-Gates-flew-Jeffrey-Epstein-Loliota-Express-2013-years-pedophile-prison-stay.html

    3+
    avataravataravatar
  4. Robert A. McReynolds:

    Gavin Longmuir:
    There has long been speculation that the Clinton Machine has something incriminating on Roberts — or more likely on some member of Robert’s family.  That used to sound very tin-foil hat territory , but now that we have seen the open unpunished corruption in the FBI, CIA, FISA Court, etc — I just don’t know.

    Oh if we could only clarify this little tid-bit:

    Gates was not the only famous name to hop aboard Epstein’s plane either, with the serial pedophile also welcoming famed newsman Walter Cronkite, architect Peter Marino and a passenger identified as John Roberts.

    He [John Roberts] flew with Epstein on at least two occasions according to flight records, from March 22, 2010 and February 10, 2011.

    In 2010 the plane with Roberts traveled from Palm Beach to Oakland, and the following year from Palm Beach to Teterboro.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7350469/Bill-Gates-flew-Jeffrey-Epstein-Loliota-Express-2013-years-pedophile-prison-stay.html

    Yea, not tin foil hatish at all. You know not every conspiracy theory is incorrect. Actually many of them are true but those in power want to gaslight people into thinking that once you go down a conspiracy path you’re heading toward crazy town. It’s not always the case.

    2+
    avataravatar
  5. My understanding – and it may be incomplete – is that the Court released an opinion on the matter of these ballots, but not in writing. maybe because it’s a 4-4 court right now? I don’t know. But I don’t think it’s a ‘ruling’ per se. My understanding is, if Coney Barrett is approved and seated in the Court in time, this matter will be revisited before the election, and she – the recipient of as much hate and prejudice as a female can possibly attract in this MeToo-Socialized-Identity-Politicked American society – will be the lucky deciding judicial voter.

    IF –

    she doesn’t recuse herself.

    2+
    avataravatar
  6. Pencilvania:
    My understanding – and it may be incomplete – is that the Court released an opinion on the matter of these ballots, but not in writing. maybe because it’s a 4-4 court right now? I don’t know. But I don’t think it’s a ‘ruling’ per se. My understanding is, if Coney Barrett is approved and seated in the Court in time, this matter will be revisited before the election, and she – the recipient of as much hate and prejudice as a female can possibly attract in this MeToo-Socialized-Identity-Politicked American society – will be the lucky deciding judicial voter.

    IF –

    she doesn’t recuse herself.

    While all that may be true, the fact of the matter is that as of this very second, the PA Supreme Court ruling holds and ballots claimed to be mail-in without a post mark can be counted at least three days after the election thanks to one John Benedict Roberts, Esquire.

    2+
    avataravatar

Leave a Reply