A prosecution of Mr. Assange could pit the interests of the administration against Mr. Trump’s. Mr. Assange could help answer the central question of the investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III: whether any Trump associates conspired with Russia to interfere in the presidential race. If the case against Mr. Assange includes charges that he acted as an agent of a foreign power, anyone who knowingly cooperated with him could be investigated as a co-conspirator, former senior law-enforcement officials said.
I think it would be interesting to have Assange offered immunity from prosecution in exchange for complete testimony on all these matters. In addition to the interests mentioned in the quote above, recall that there was some earlier moves in this direction until scuttled by FBI Director Comey. Why would he have done that?
Over the past few years it was apparent that Senator John McCain and Senator Lindsey Graham stood together on many significant political issues. Many might use even stronger terms to describe their political affiliation.
John McCain passed in August, this year. He was an avowed opponent of President Donald Trump and did all he could to thwart Trump’s presidency. And Lindsey Graham didn’t seem far away from McCain in those days.
During the Justice Kavanaugh (then Judge) hearings a sea change occurred in Lindsey Graham’s approach and he now appears to be a staunch Trump supporter, but still willing to express different views when necessary. How is this explained? Was Graham slighting his political inclinations in deference to his friendship with McCain? Or has Trump’s successes and Democrats leaning towards insanity affected Graham’s approach?
I have a question on this topic. I’m almost certain this was a major influence on Donald Trump’s decision to enter the political fray. There have been some mentions by his opponents about corruption in his administration but anything in that area takes a backseat to accusations of racism and other ism’s. My specific question: Can anyone name a specific politician that would fit as someone the President was closely associated with before his entry into the 2016 campaign. I know he made political contributions but can anyone single out any made for favorable actions, in other words, for acts beyond just policies that Trump wanted to support or to make sure he would be heard if he had an issue?
Executive Order to stop birthright citizenship. Our President surely knows how to cause the major media to report on the topic he chooses. This one, coupled with the caravans, may hold until Election Day.
Paul Craig Roberts and I have some things in common. We were both students at Georgia Tech in the late fifties. We both worked at the Treasury Department under President Reagan. I have admired him for a long time as he has confronted the Establishment.
Another post with discussions about traffic and commuting made me think of Atlanta. And I think we have some Atlanta residents here. I guess I can call myself a native. I grew up there in the period from the early forties until the late fifties. I went back a little over a decade ago for a high school reunion and the traffic was murderous.
I lived in Carey Park, West End, Lakewood and some other areas for which I don’t recall the neighborhood names. I attended three different elementary schools (Carey Park, Lena H. Cox, West Haven) and four high schools (West Fulton, Murphy, O’Keefe, and Fulton). I did two years at Georgia Tech and had my first full-time employment in Atlanta when the minimum wage was $.75/hr and that’s what I earned. Candy bars and Coca-Colas(6 ounces in the original bottle) were a nickel, except Mounds and Almond Joys were a dime. A cup of coffee was a nickel and cigarettes were twelve cents a pack, I smoked camels when I was 12. I rode the streetcar (River Line) back and forth to school part of those years.
I used to watch the stock car races from on a hill outside Lakewood Park’s one mile dirt track and I would hitchhike from Lakewood to Ponce de Leon ballpark where I was a ballboy for the Atlanta Crackers.
Atlanta was a nice city in them ole days. Traffic? I went anywhere in the area once I had a bike.
In an earlier post I ventured that eventually we might know what has gone on within the DoJ and the FBI.
TKC 1101 said ‘Trump must not only fire and jail the conspiracy, but he needs to rebuild the DOJ and FBI underneath the covers. If you were him would you destroy the FBI and DOJ or just clean it up? What is best for America?’
Hypatia said ‘It’s not so much what we don’t know at this point, it’s what does Trump know?’
The President seems really cool on this lately. TKC 1101 has suggested he has leverage, particularly over Rosenstein, and that appears correct. Rosenstein is doing things that can only happen if the POTUS allows.
Now it looks as if Trump’s leverage is very broad indeed. The Senate Majority Leader has really gotten with the program with judicial appointments. Mueller has been quiet (winding down?). The latest is the plea deal of James Wolfe, a measly guilty to one count of lying to the FBI when he committed major infractions of illegal disclosures of classified material, (protecting Senators on the Intelligence Committee?).
Dealmaking that restores institutional integrity might be sad but not bad for the country.
I get the feeling that Trump has all scenarios covered and is just waiting for the midterm election results to select the proper action.
Normal FBI background investigations are not restricted to the extent reported for the supplemental. Is the supplemental restricted just to prevent it leaking or is it actually classified sensitive because it contains information about crimes committed that may yet be subject to federal prosecution?
Nobody told me when I signed up that I could not propound a conspiracy theory. That’s one of the restrictions I disliked at the other site.
So here it is. Senator Diane Feinstein is a puppet. She is not a sock puppet. But more like a marionette controlled by a puppet master out of sight.
Remember when she was the ranking member of the Senate Intelligence Committee during the 2 years leading up to President Trump’s election in 2016. She was one of the ‘gang of eight’ who got quarterly briefings on intelligence matters along with Burr, Schumer, McConnell, Ryan, Pelosi, Nunes, and Schiff. Notice California is well represented on both intelligence committees. These committees deal a lot with the DoJ, FBI, CIA, NSA, other intelligence components including the White House.
There was lots going on involving these committees during those two years related to the framing of the President’s campaign for collusion with Russia on election interference. There are two names that I have seen associated with the Senate Intelligence Committee that have been associated with questionable activities during the campaign and after, Dan Jones and James Wolfe. Jones left the committee and with some big money had connections with Fusion GPS and the Steele Dossier. Wolfe was involved in leaking classified information to the New York Times reporter. I think Jones operates now from California and I suspect there are quite a few staffers from California on these committees. Diane Feinstein left this committee and became the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Mark Warner took her place on the ‘gang of eight’ and he has been involved in some strange transactions since. And we all know Adam Schiff has been active in hindering the work of the House Committee.
Now it looks as if the puppet master has been orchestrating what has gone on regarding the Kavanaugh fiasco for the last 3 months. Feinstein denies doing anything out of order but I don’t she is speaking for the actions of her staff. Grassley has called for some investigation into how the Ford case got handled the way it was.
I have suspicions that our government is not being run by those who we sometimes think are running it. Who else thinks congressional staffers from California and their outside contacts have an undue influence on what has been going on?
I just responded to my first polling survey since forever. The knock on my door came a few minutes before I would be leaving for my daily walk. So the pollster got a response from both my wife and me. If I was walking he would have left with nothing.
When the politics gets hot, as now with Kavanaugh, I get a lot more calls from numbers I don’t recognize and which I don’t answer. I had to learn this through experience.
Is there evidence that the actual reporting of polling results influences voting, either how people vote or whether they vote at all?