Occasionally Ratburger.org gets new members that are confused and dazed by things. Some are angry also. They come here to vent and publish things that would be censored other places. I know some consider these posts are not the best but they are in keeping with being open and freedom of thought.
When you write a post and publish it, by default only the first two paragraphs will appear on the Ratburger home page. To read the balance of the post, a reader needs to click “[Read More]”, which will display the complete post and its comments.
This is done to allow visitors to the site to skim through the titles and start of posts and decide which they want to read in their entirety.
The definition of “paragraph” is, as with most things in WordPress, a brutal hack based on looking at the text and guessing what constitutes a paragraph. The way the code is implemented, a heading at the start of the post or a photo is considered a paragraph. This means, for example, that if you start your post with a heading and a photo, visitors to the home page won’t see any of the text of the body of your post without clicking “[Read More]”.
You can avoid this infelicity by placing an explicit excerpt mark in your post. This indicates the portion of the post which should be shown on the home page and which subsequent material should only appear if the user clicks on “[Read More]” or the post’s title to read the whole thing.
To place an excerpt mark, click on the line which marks the break and click the “Insert Read More” icon (which looks like a two lane road). It will put a break in your post where the material above will be shown on the home page and that below only to those who “read the whole thing”.
For example, in my Monday Meals post for 2018-08-13, I have a heading, image, and first paragraph which I want to appear on the home page, so I inserted a “Read More” break after the first text paragraph. If I hadn’t done this, the automatic excerpt generator would have shown only the heading and photo, which would have been less than ideal.
WordPress “shortcode” features which are used for such things as spoiler warnings and including mathematics in posts do not work in home page excerpts. If your post contains such things, you can use explicit “Read More” breaks to ensure those who visit the home page will not see them. When a user clicks through to the full post, they will be displayed correctly.
How easy would it be to exclude one category from the regular view?
I am trying to be proactive. There is usually a topic that gets a million posts. People get tired of seeing those. Of course, people could just skip over them but they don’t. If there was a button to filter these out, I think people would like that. It seems at most there is only one or two of these issues. The power is given to the user to filter so it is a bottom up decision.
I am asking this publicly to find out if people are for it and in keeping with our openness policy.
Haakon put up a post that had a good idea, what is the best texty logo for Ratburger.org. Unfortunately, the post went a different direction so this is a second try.
His logo was this, (>R<). I will put this in comment #1. Click like to vote for it. I will put others in other comments to “vote” on. Please add your one if you have one.
“What is Ratburger?” is a good question but it was not high on the priority list when we started. The big thing was just to see if something would work. John got the site up on his test domain. And it just so happened his test domain name was Ratburger.org. My first thought was “RATBURGER.ORG?!!!!” (I often think in capital letters with four exclamation points.) Then I realized the name was in line or is it online with my thinking. I wanted something memorable and down to earth. Something with a smirk and fun in it. Well, it does that, doesn’t it?
I have talked to John on a conference call weekly for a few years. (It is rumored he used to have a full head of hair before he started talking to me.) I got to know him so I knew a site done with him would be technically good and be interesting. He has always been open to the ideas of others and even has some ideas of his own.
I think of John like this.
The old joke:
Employee: How high?
The John Variant:
Me suggesting: We need to go higher.
John: I have built an elevator. What floor? BTW, I think making an express elevator is not needed at this time but if we do need one the perpetual motion model is economical.
What is Ratburger.org? It is just a site trying to get off the ground. It is a site that doesn’t want to take itself too seriously but does want to allow serious discussions without all the crap. Hopefully, it is a site you will want to come to not to get angry but to smile.
I know that we have many flavors of conservative here. Do we have any rules on who we exclude? This is not for the sock and the scientist, this is for all of us, the people who form the Ratburger community. It is we who decide whom to include and whom to exclude.
Now, Ratburger is a right-wing, conservative site. I will fight tooth and nail to ensure that remains the case, to avoid invoking Conquest’s Second Law.
Any organization not explicitly and constitutionally right-wing will sooner or later become left-wing.
(I note with some irony that I linked to National Review, which seems like it is following the 2nd and 3rd laws – that post is from Derbyshire) However, what does that mean for Ratburger?
I know several people who are not Republican or even conservative, but might enjoy this site. Moreover, they have knowledge that might benefit Ratburghers, such as preparedness and urban architecture. Should I invite them? The most liberal of the group is around David Rubin level. Should they expect a torch & pitchfork mob if they come by here?
More broadly, how do you maintain a conservative organization without being obsessed with purity tests?
Most of us came from a place with Moderators. I don’t like the term. I don’t like it for three reasons.
- It sounds pretentious.
- It gives the wrong impression.
- Most people have never dealt with a Moerator before.
I propose Ref as in referee as the correct term. For at least these three reasons.
- It sounds more down to earth.
- It explains the job better.
- Most of us have had experiences with refs.
I know this might sound like semantics but it is important. A Moderator will call a game it seems at a drop of a hat. A Ref would never do that. A Moderator will give a speech where a Ref makes the call and leaves the field. A Moderator tries to influence the debate. If a Ref does they need to be fired.
Fouls and penalties are part of the game. There is no need to be particularly ashamed of them. A Ref doesn’t humiliate players. They don’t add snark to the call. They respect the players for they love the game.
Booing the Ref is also part of the game. Whether it is fair or not close calls are seen differently. No one penalizes a captain of the team for voicing objections to the call. Refs do the best they can and make mistakes. It is an art more than a science and the Ref is appreciated for upholding rules impartially. Everyone expects lousy calls but want to see them on both sides.
A Ref does things in the open. They don’t have a private conference with the player. The judgment is made from public knowledge. The spectators, the players, and offender see the reason for the call. Players don’t get penalized for things said in locker rooms. No hidden disappearances.
A Ref is not a star. No one remembers even the names of most refs, right?They do their jobs without chips on their shoulders. They keep the ball in play and don’t pick fights with players. They can throw a player out of a game but they don’t have the power to suspend or ban. That is made higher up.
What I like about a Ref is everyone can agree “I was robbed.” and not lose sleep over it. And a Ref doesn’t call you on your cell phone after the game to reprimand you.
What do you think?
“Hey, it’s free.” has been at the top of Ratburger.org from the beginning. This site’s desire is to have free and open discussions with as little as possible restrictions. It is family friendly not to restrict speech but to have the discussion be able to reach the most people possible. It also sets us apart to the “excrement excrement copulate copulate genitalia” sites.
Oh, by the way we don’t charge. We don’t track. We don’t clutter your screen with advertisements.
Thank you, John Walker!!!
(Maybe I should number these. I’ll put in the date, YYMMDD, in the title.)