Dems, You’ve Got Male!

Looks  like  white-lightning-in-a-bottle Beta-Male O’Rourke  is being eclipsed by Peter Pansy.

Sure, Buttigieg (the name says it all!)   is white, and he’s a man.  So far no worries for Beta.

But while the best Beta can do to avoid the awful political obloquy of his manhood is pretend he’s still 12 (witness the skateboarding gif)  and go trippin’ round the country  while “mom” makes the money —

—Peter  doesn’t even have to pretend he “won’t grow up”!  He’s a grown man who  has opted out of the biological imperative.

For some reason Dem women love that!

Why?  Do they think gay men like women?  

It’s hard to believe we’re at the point where this needs to be explicated, but: See,  ladies,  the point about being a gay  man is that you don’t like women.  If you did, why would you want to watch other men flouncing around in grotesque femface, broadly and maliciously parodying the most egregious stereotypes of female behavior?

W.H. Auden and his friends used to refer to women as “fish”.  That is so perfect on many levels.  If you are a man, a Lord Of Creation, well, a fish doesn’t even inhabit the same element as you.  And even in this day and age where we’re  flirting with the idea of interspecies sexplay, I haven’t heard anybody fantasize about doin’ it with a fish.  They don t have any orifices which could possibly accommodate a man!  ( Yes I know about the amorous dolphins, but they’re mammals at least)  .  Nah, if you found yourself in a position to eat a fish that someone else had gutted, fileted,and fried, ,  okay, but otherwise,they just aren’t creatures you normally think about.  At all.

I think Dem women are taken in by the unspoken condescension of gay men,  who kinda treat them as honorary homosexuals. ( And that would be because, if you think the only humans worth loving  are men like you,  well, you gotta have some fellow-feeling for the poor fish who also  love ‘em, in their own slimy,  stinky way.)

But none of this matters.  If you’re a male and straight, you better be black like Fairfax.   Otherwise:  be sure your sins will find you out— right, Uncle Joe?  (Relax, you didn’t do anything Kerry didn’t do to Edwards in 2000!)

Bet-O and Pete-O  are both white males, kinda cute and mopsy-lookin’.  But    when the Demfems have to decide, well, they don’t really like themselves, so they’ll go for  the genetic dead end.

Here, fishy fishy! 

0

Echo into the Future

Dateline: Paris, October 17, 2021: The trial of Salvatore Savini commenced today for the alleged arson hoax of the Notre Dame Cathedral in April of 2019.

The fanatic Christian is charged with arson, fraud and a hate crime for planting Islamic artifacts in an attempt to mislead investigators into believing the arson of the Notre Dame Cathedral was perpetrated by Islamic radicals.

Mr. Savini’s attorney, while not absolving his client’s actions, has claimed his client was very distressed at the growing number of churches in France being desecrated, burned and vandalized, and believed blaming the destruction of the iconic cathedral on Islamists was the only way to bring attention to bear on the issue.

The plea entered is “not guilty by temporary insanity.”

The attorney, Jacque Cochraine, is planning on using what is known as the Jussie Smollet Defence as a legal precedent. His client was so triggered by these attacks on so many churches in France, he felt compelled to act.

The prosecution claims that Mr. Savini by perpetrating this hoax, has done lasting damage to the Muslim community, and damaged civil relations between Christians and Muslims.

2+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar

The Decline and Fall of the WH Correspondent’s Dinner

The White House Correspondents’ dinner, enthusiastically called “nerd prom” for years by Washington journalists looking for champagne and selfies, is sobering up, with next week’s gala drawing few celebrities, no president, and now no press secretary.

As if to rub in the lost luster of the event, instead of the usual comedian, a historian will serve as the “entertainment.”

President Trump, snubbing the dinner a third time to host a rally, diverted top aides from the gala, while a faction within the White House Correspondents’ Association nixed the comedy routine, resulting in the least glitzy gathering in decades

Don’t you just love it??? I’m especially delighted that the Donald is doing a rally the same night that will be sure to dominate the ratings.

13+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar

”We Will Never Forget!” (But We Will Revise.)

“We will never forget!” was on bumper stickers, T shirts,  coffee mugs in the aftermath of 9/11.

And boy, did we fly the flag!  There was actually a shortage of ‘em!

Sure,  there were a few voices to the effect that we had it coming, but nobody wanted to actually admit  to being in the “Blame America First” camp.

Who could have predicted that, less than 2 decades later, a message from the President of the US, a native New Yorker, quoting that once-universal mantra “we will never forget!”  would be decried as..what: racist, Islamophobist, White Nationalist….fill in the blank.

And not out of the blue, either: Trump,was responding to a speech by an antisemitic Muslim lefty belittling and dismissing the 9/11 attacks!

America, honey!! You awake yet?

This is  what CAIR  and its ilk have done to our country since 9/1, aided and abetted by the likes of Bush 2 and Blair.

Maybe GWB actually thought  Americans were going to start burning Mosques ( it’d have been a lot harder to find one then than now; they have proliferated since 9/11!) and the homes of Muslim Americans.

I don’t think there was ever a danger of that.   Copies of the Koran sold out  in the immediate  aftermath as Americans belatedly sought to “understand” the hatred!  Violent backlash  would not have happened  even if Bush hadn’t spouted that garbage about Islam being a “religion of peace” (Though I reckon most Americans didn’t actually read  the paperback Korans  they bought, or we never  woulda swallowed that pap…)  His motives may have been good,but he set the stage for Muslims to  claim victim status.  They did not waste the opportunity.

Of course this post was triggered (yes in all senses,) by the awful images of the burning spire of Notre Dame.

In 2001, such wanton,  tragic destruction would have been the occasion for near-universal mourning and sympathy, for the city, for Catholics., dare I even say: for the Christian West.  Or at least  by the Christian West.

Not today.

If the crimes of 9/11 had been perpetrated in 4/19, we would  already  be sympathizing with the poor disadvantaged Muslims who were somehow suffering such desperation, such despair, caused of course by America’s policies, that they had no choice really, but  to enroll in that flight school in Florida where they learned to steer but not to land.

No, we will never forget.    But we have allowed what we remember to be manipulated, falsified, and turned against us.

7+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar

Islam and Notre Dame

Just a follow-up to my earlier post Notre Dame and Islam, in which I exercised the right (a privilege when speaking on somebody else’s site, thank you gentlemen) to ask whether the Notre Dame fire was just one more casualty in the ongoing war between Islam and anything which is not Islam.

Doesn’t look like it’s part of the war.  I don;t know what the cause is, but I concur with those who have said that if it were an attack, we would probably know by now.  Of course, some nasty people are celebrating the conflagration in the name of Islam, which is only to be expected. But this is not the same as saying it was an attack.  Frankly, by this time I expected to hear at least bogus claims of responsibility.  Now I add quickly that I further expect any such claims, real or specious, to be suppressed by a thoroughly dhimmified western establishment, but on the whole, I would expect to hear more by now if this had been an attack.

This notion of constant war is not wrong, not misplaced, and most importantly not the product of any western bigotry.  Islam is not just on a mission — Islam is itself a mission to subjugate the entire world in the name of their deity.  If you’re not down with the cause, you’re not part of the club.  The Three Laws of Islamodynamics are:

  1. You’re not greater than Islam
  2. You’re not equal to Islam
  3. You won’t escape Islam

This leaves only subjugation to Islam.  Sure, Islamists and Muslims of various stripes quibble about methods, there is not a single practicing Muslim who will tell you that you, you dirty infidel, are entitled to the same rights and respect as the lowest Muslim.  Even reserving (as I do) wiggle room for Muslims who do not profess Islamism, that is, an active desire to take over the world, they themselves have no ideological room to allow that you may be an equal.  This can even take as noble a form as wishing to enlighten an acquaintance, which is a healthy desire shared by any proselytizing religion.  The difference is that Islam is and has been engaged in a violent war of conquest.  There’s a reason that the Crusades were fought in formerly Christian and Jewish lands, and why the West’s most celebrated battles against Islam were all fought on European soil.

It is important to be able to discuss this very real situation in public, or else we simply lose.  A people who will not speak will also not act.

11+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar

Guy VerHofstadt Sees the Light; Admits the Light

GVH (speaking, below) admits about half of what we all know to be true.  It’s just impressive for some reason to see him take Tusk to task for insufficient zeal while starting to admit in public that Farage has more power than most of the rest of those twits combined.

Tusk’s lame response is — lame.  Talk about limping over the goal line.

GVH is only admitting part of the problem, still.  He says that if Brexit drags on,m then it risks “poisoning” Europe.  The truth is that Brexit is likely to catch on once it has been demonstrated no matter how long it takes.  It’s just one more reason why the EU will do anything to keep Britain on extensions — had Britain already left on schedule, Italy would now be holding a referendum!

9+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar

Today’s Poem: Dover Beach

The fire at Notre Dame brought to mind Matthew Arnold’s poem Dover Beach. Notre Dame can be rebuilt if there is the will. It has been rebuilt before, most recently in the mid-1800s after Victor Hugo’s novel The Hunchback of Notre Dame (actual name Notre-Dame du Paris) renewed interest in the place. (In typical French fashion they botched the restoration. The work that was being done where the fire started was in the tower rebuilt during that 19th-century restoration. It was apparently done poorly enough that it needed to be completely redone after just over a century.) Yet the question is not whether it can be rebuilt, but whether the Sea of Faith has receded to the point where the will to rebuild it is gone.

Dover Beach

Matthew Arnold

The sea is calm to-night.
The tide is full, the moon lies fair
Upon the straits; on the French coast the light
Gleams and is gone; the cliffs of England stand;
Glimmering and vast, out in the tranquil bay.
Come to the window, sweet is the night-air!
Only, from the long line of spray
Where the sea meets the moon-blanched land,
Listen! you hear the grating roar
Of pebbles which the waves draw back, and fling,
At their return, up the high strand,
Begin, and cease, and then again begin,
With tremulous cadence slow, and bring
The eternal note of sadness in.

Sophocles long ago
Heard it on the A gaean, and it brought
Into his mind the turbid ebb and flow
Of human misery; we
Find also in the sound a thought,
Hearing it by this distant northern sea.

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth’s shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.

Ah, love, let us be true
To one another! for the world, which seems
To lie before us like a land of dreams,
So various, so beautiful, so new,
Hath really neither joy, nor love, nor light,
Nor certitude, nor peace, nor help for pain;
And we are here as on a darkling plain
Swept with confused alarms of struggle and flight,
Where ignorant armies clash by night.

6+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar

Notre Dame and Islam

The silent question, which will cease to be silent in 3, 2, 1… is:

Did the Muslims burn Notre Dame?

First, is it a reasonable question to ask in the absence of credible evidence to date?

Second, what evidence exists?

The second question breaks down into two pieces; historic, trend or indicator evidence, and of course evidence specific to the case at hand. A historical trend is insufficient to condemn in the current sense, but it is not meaningless either.  And Islamists have both threatened and attacked Notre Dame before; and Paris in general is a target:

On 6 June 2017, at around 16:00 CET, French police shot a man who attacked a police officer with a hammer outside Notre Dame cathedral.
On 4 September 2016, a car containing seven canisters of gas and pages with Arabic writing was found parked near Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris.
Nov 13, 2015 – Paris attacks of 2015, coordinated terrorist attacks that took place in Paris on the evening of November 13, 2015. At least 130 people were killed and more than 350 were injured.
At least 12 people have been shot dead in Paris – 2 of them police officers – after masked men stormed the offices of a French magazine. 10 others have been wounded – several critically – at the offices of Charlie Hebdo, a satirical weekly which has printed cartoons deriding the prophet mohammed.
Nov 2, 2011 – The offices of French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo have been destroyed by a petrol bomb, a day after it named the Prophet Mohammed as its “editor-in-chief”

There are many more.  So this, as the best evidence to date, means that the answer to the first question is an emphatic YES.

1) YES, it is reasonable to ask if Muslims burned notre Dame for their religion.

A significant portion of Islam is actively at war with the West, and Notre Dame is a leading symbol of the West. We find ourselves in a parallel to a pre-Crusades situation, where an expanding, conquering Islam is claiming vast swathes of territory through a combination of continuous public agitation, massive migration, specific and credible threats, a terrorizing background noise of constant, random, low-level violence, and the spectacular application of targeted destruction of Western symbols.

It would be unreasonable *not* to ask.

2) Standing by.

There are, of course, powerful prospective explanations for an accidental origin.  There was ongoing work.  The place is reported to be full of candles and torches, flammable furnishings, and as we have seen, flammable structure.

So it would also be unreasonable to insist that we know the answer.

Cue the immediate condemnation of any who would introduce the question of Notre Dame being just one more attack in the war.  Those who issue this condemnation refuse to publicly admit the war in which we find ourselves, and will never be convinced.  They break down neatly into the stupid, the merely dishonest, and the actively deceptive.

We have the right to ask relevant and reasonable questrions.  Frankly, we retain the right to ask any damned question we like, but in this, we are on solid ground.

And so I ask:  Did the Muslims burn Notre Dame?

7+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar

Trump’s Revenge

Trump ‘sanctuary cities’ revenge plan could backfire, help immigrants stay in USA…

 

‘An idea floated by President Donald Trump to send immigrants from the border to “sanctuary cities” to exact revenge on Democratic foes could end up doing the migrants a favor by placing them in locations that make it easier to put down roots and stay in the country.’

Did POTUS say this was being considered in order to exact revenge on Democrats?

1+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar

Keep Your Eye on the Balk

For those who are interested, just a reminder that Russian collusion has always been about the Clintons.
Obama was involved — Hillary was committed, and her miraculously lost e-mails are the smoking gun for a web of corruption. Which is why they were lost.
The Mueller investigation is cover for the very real evidence lying about everywhere. Notice that Mueller did not investigate “Russian Collusion”, but the Trump campaign. No Democrats were harmed in the making of this farce.
Assange is a piece of crap, but he still has, Gollum-like, a positive role to play. He’s a balky patsy who, like most patsies, got there through his own moral compromise. But still he balks!

4+

Users who have liked this post:

  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar
  • avatar